Peugeot Forums banner

1 - 20 of 27 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
10 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
HI we've just bought a 2017 Automatic 1.2 130 model. However we've noticed an issue with the fuel consumption, we've managed about 100 miles on £45... online seems to state the car should do 42-72mpg (i know excessive) the car shows that it is average 32mpg. We've got it booked in with peugeot for the 10th october and they say it needs a new software download. Im wondering if this is a common fault or anyone has an idea whats going on?

We put £10 in yesterday, i've done about 15 miles and the fuel light is back on, i cant visibly smell or see any fuel leaks.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
242 Posts
HI we've just bought a 2017 Automatic 1.2 130 model. However we've noticed an issue with the fuel consumption, we've managed about 100 miles on £45... online seems to state the car should do 42-72mpg (i know excessive) the car shows that it is average 32mpg. We've got it booked in with peugeot for the 10th october and they say it needs a new software download. Im wondering if this is a common fault or anyone has an idea whats going on?

We put £10 in yesterday, i've done about 15 miles and the fuel light is back on, i cant visibly smell or see any fuel leaks.
Disclaimer....I may be wrong....

Have you changed from a car with a bigger engine or more Torque?

Driving a 1.2 with 130 bhp, it relies heavily upon the Turbo to give it extra oomph therefore requiring a deeper stamp on the accelerator.

Every car I've seen with small engines (1.0 to 1.3) seem to have rubbish mpg against what is claimed due to the driver needing to apply more acceleration to drive as they would any other car normally. It would reach the claimed figures but only if you drove miss daisy.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
10 Posts
Disclaimer....I may be wrong....

Have you changed from a car with a bigger engine or more Torque?

Driving a 1.2 with 130 bhp, it relies heavily upon the Turbo to give it extra oomph therefore requiring a deeper stamp on the accelerator.

Every car I've seen with small engines (1.0 to 1.3) seem to have rubbish mpg against what is claimed due to the driver needing to apply more acceleration to drive as they would any other car normally. It would reach the claimed figures but only if you drove miss daisy.
Thanks for your reply, we've changed from a 1.4 Diesel 208.
Whilst i expected worse economy, the dash tells me im doing 34mpg... id expect to get more than 95 miles out of £45 of petrol even if yes it is a bit thirstier on the fuel?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,514 Posts
The official quoted figures are always rubbish.
There is an online real world fuel consumption checker on the Peugeot website which will give a little more accurate idea of what you might expect.

But quoting cost of fuel against approximate distance is not very accurate.

The only really accurate way is to fill the tankk, reset the trip. Wait till you have emptied it then refill, note mileage on trip and quantity of fuel put in. Then do the sums. But in my experience the trip average fuel consumption reading is fairly accurate. But you need to average over more miles.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
49 Posts
I have the same car as you, but a 2015 model with 24,000 miles on it. We average 44 mpg on mixed driving, but short journeys get about 37mpg.

By way of comparison, my previous 2014 308 2.0 Bluehdi auto did 52mpg on mixed driving and 47mpg on shorter journeys.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
10 Posts
Discussion Starter #6
I have the same car as you, but a 2015 model with 24,000 miles on it. We average 44 mpg on mixed driving, but short journeys get about 37mpg.

By way of comparison, my previous 2014 308 2.0 Bluehdi auto did 52mpg on mixed driving and 47mpg on shorter journeys.
Thanks for this, even as low as 35mpg i'd expect us to have got about 70 miles out of £10, not 6 miles... we'll fill it up today and then work it out to when its empty
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
242 Posts
Further to my previous post, I have always found it easier to get decent mpg returns from vehicles with bigger, more powerful engines.

I have a 2016 308 GT - 2 litre, 180 bhp.

I drive in quite a spirited manner and average about 41mpg.

That sais it all really.

These so called economical cars with smaller engines and big turbos(relative) do not do what they say on the tin.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,514 Posts
Isn't that the same as saying, when asked directions to somewhere, "if I were you I wouldn't start from here"?

The right foot makes more difference to fuel consumption than anything else. But yours does seem to be a bit more thirsty than it should be.

Be interesting to see if a new software download makes a difference.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
978 Posts
Even if it does seem to be a bit thirsty from that small test I really don't think that any real conclusion can be drawn until a proper brim to brim calculation has been made. This will smooth out out some of the small effects that can bedevil these back of the sleeve calculations.

In my experience the on-board computer whilst giving an indication cannot be relied upon for a true figure. Most times it seems to overestimate the mpg but sometimes it can be the other way. I use the instantaneous readout as an reminder to lift off my right foot.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
10 Posts
Discussion Starter #10
Thanks for all your posts on here regarding this. The on board computer seems to be indicating an average of 27mpg which is way below anything I’ve read online. I’ve done what everyone has suggested now, waited for the car to run onto —- miles remaining. Filled it up and now I’ll work out what I’ve done when I get back to 0. It’s booked in anyway for a new software download on 10th October, does anyone know if these sort of things can be to improve economy?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,514 Posts
What you haven't said is what sort of driving, urban, open country, cruising along a motorway? Length of journey also makes a huge difference. No engine will be economical on a 5 mile journey as the first three are warming up still.
For this reason you do need to check over a longer period, so taking into account different journeys.
If for instance you were using it to commute 10 miles in and out of central London in the rush hour, 27mpg would be excellent.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
10 Posts
Discussion Starter #12
What you haven't said is what sort of driving, urban, open country, cruising along a motorway? Length of journey also makes a huge difference. No engine will be economical on a 5 mile journey as the first three are warming up still.
For this reason you do need to check over a longer period, so taking into account different journeys.
If for instance you were using it to commute 10 miles in and out of central London in the rush hour, 27mpg would be excellent.
It’s a mixture of driving really, we’ve done 2 motorway journeys 70miles round trip and then yes our commute is about 6 miles round trip city driving.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,514 Posts
A 6 mile round trip (3 miles each way?) in the city will not produce any good fuel consumption. Car is only just warming up by the end of the journey.

And to think I was disapointed when my 308 only did 50 mpg.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
18 Posts
I have a 308 allure puretech 130 registered April 2016. I have been monitoring consumption since day one.

My overall consumption over 2 years 6 months is 43.2mpg. However, depending on type of driving, each tank has ranged from 36 to 50mpg.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
978 Posts
[SmirkMode]
We went out for a drive over to Newark today. About 280 miles mostly on motorways and dual carriageways never going over 60 - 65mph. Haven't done a brim to brim check yet but indicated consumption is some 68mpg.
[/SmirkMode]
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,514 Posts
I was towing a trailer tent in France at 75 mph (no limit for trailers there on autoroutes) and averaged 51 mpg over about 2000 miles.
Yes at 60 - 65 on open roads, upper 60s mpg would be easy. At 75 (not towing) I get 61 mpg. [/more smirk mode]
Sadly it can drop to mid 50s round town.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,476 Posts
You can always get good consumption figures from steady state cruising at medium speed. E.g steady 55mph will show 55-60 mpg. Typical Jersey driving, short journeys, narrow roads, lots of stopping at intersections, up and down hills, average 24 mpg.

It ain't so much the car as what you do with it. But heavier cars with poor aerodynamics will generally suffer in comparison to lighter, more streamlined examples. My Suzuki Cappuccino (small engine with turbo) does 40 mpg in the same Jersey scenario.

EDIT: Just remembered - all other things being equal, the best fuel consumption with a turbocharged engine is high boost at low rpm, so the OP could try using the highest gear possible (i.e. change up early) to keep the revs down.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
48 Posts
I have a gtline eat6 1.2 130. Had car about 2 weeks. Despite driving really gently I struggle to get 36 mpg around local roads. I can usually coax a car to get a lot better than this. Yes I know it's local journeys only but 36mpg is absolutely abysmal. It's kinda spoilt the whole experience of my lovely motor! Manufacturers figures are always inflated but this is a joke. ��
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
48 Posts
Thanks for all your posts on here regarding this. The on board computer seems to be indicating an average of 27mpg which is way below anything I’ve read online. I’ve done what everyone has suggested now, waited for the car to run onto —- miles remaining. Filled it up and now I’ll work out what I’ve done when I get back to 0. It’s booked in anyway for a new software download on 10th October, does anyone know if these sort of things can be to improve economy?

What was the result of the software update please.
 
1 - 20 of 27 Posts
Top