![]() |
| |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 22
|
Does anybody know what reliability is like with the 2.2 petrol?
Whats your average MPG & Can somebody please tell me when the cambelt interval is? Looking to purchase a coupe with the 2.2, so just want to hear some peoples experiences
__________________
D |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 130
|
Quote:
Avg mpg is about 32 on short trips but I can get up to mid 40's on long ones. Cam is about 80000 if I recall. Most issues I found when researching to buy are the usual ones: egr, map sensor, coil pack and injectors My 2 litre has plenty of poke, slightly weak pulling away but alot of power in 3rd upwards Egr needs mapping to engine when replaced. Main dealer told me most petrols idle roughly in cold weather but are fine once warm....mine certainly does. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 22
|
Thanks for the info kiristue!
__________________
D |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Atherton, Boston Lincs, or Akbuk, Turkey
Posts: 932
|
I have read the 2.2 petrol is the best one. Chopper1192 knows more about them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 67
|
The 2.2 realy only has one downside - it's poor mpg..
The 3.0 gets roughly the same mpg, despite having so much more oomph. ![]() The inlet VCT wheel is a weak point on them, listen if it sounds like a diesel when starting it from cold. Sometimes it can be cured by using a thicker oil, but some of them are really bad. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 4
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: PLYMOUTH,DEVON
Posts: 535
|
yes replace variators
__________________
407 1.6 HDI FAP 110 PP OWNER PLYMOUTH
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Northants
Posts: 2,312
|
There's less than a second between the 2.2 sparker and the 3.0, which was only available with the power sapping auto box, so don't believe the bull. The 3.0 has never been a fast engine, and even when it first appeared was a bit puny for its capacity. Mine had been remapped to 191BHP and used to flush 3 litre heads down the toilet and stole its lunch money.
I'd average mid to high 30s mpg, into the high 40s on a run, which is better than many 2.2 HDi owners manage. You won't get the 3.0 within 10 MPG of those figures, low 20s all round to low 30's on a run being typical, not to mention the £450 road tax on the six... Generally the toughest 407 engine. No DMF, no FAP, no point going for the diesel over this engine. Occasional issues with noisy lifters, which isnt a problem, just noisy. Occasional coil pack problems, and they're sensitive to spark plug condition, but generally speaking they're pretty tight. The economy isn't bad if you drive sensibly, they're reliable, quick, mainly cone with the 6 speed manual, and the £1500-2000 saved over time by eliminating the DMF and FAP make it pointless buying the diesel. It's the best all-round engine in the range, and hence the one I went for. I miss mine terribly, but work moved me to a site less than 6 miles from home so I couldn't justify running 2 large cars.
__________________
If if doesn't increase acceleration, improve handling or bring me sexual gratification then I'm not interested! Last edited by chopper1192; 04-16-2012 at 09:02 PM. Reason: Glory ninety shut about cat |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 67
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|